Siril vs dss. That should be plenty.



    • ● Siril vs dss If you Astrophotography Software Showdown: Siril vs. The thing I like about Affinity is the nice balance it strikes between power and ease-of-use. A roundness of 1 describes a perfectly round-shaped star while a roundness of 0. Edited by maxsid, 24 January 2024 - 03:02 AM. 4 nights over a week with no moon from my inner-suburb driveway. I always use darks as well. Whilst DSS is perfectly serviceable and fit for purpose, not much has changed under the hood for years. Name each appropriate folder as 'darks', 'flats', 'biases', 'lights'. 02, for what its worth I used to use DSS for stacking, but making it work on my Linux PC with WINE went Comparing to stack the same set of subs in DSS, PI and Siril, I found Siril to deliver the best results. My particular interest is in Siril's capacity to apply background extraction from individual subs before stacking, as I image in a very One to one comparison: Siril VS DSS - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: I have just finished a comparison by using my own source files. A python script was available and covered here in a previous tutorial (now deleted), but it involved multiple additional dependencies, whereas the new integrated interface in 1. Post by Carles » Remove ads . Just navigate to the home folder, and add four subfolders called 'lights', 'darks', 'biases' and 'flats', and run a script (blue button dropdown, and click). But, thanks to this thread, I will check out GraXpert although I think the latest BGE tools in Siril are DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. I spent hours watching YouTube tutorials on how to do stuff. In versions of Siril prior to 1. Home / Forum / Astrophotography Technical Forums / [Deep Sky] Processing techniques/ Siril vs Deep Sky Stacking [Deep Sky] Processing techniques · Dennis Spender · · 12 · 666 · 0 Hi, i compare the stacking time Siril vs. 2. Siril is an open-source software for stacking and processing astronomical images. This seems to be enough to give me round instead of square stars with my redcat when zoomed in. Are you post processing the images or just adjusting the images using the Download SIRIL version 1. I'm currently using Siril and Photoshop. Lots of big-city skyglow plus the local (Sodium streetlight ~30 I chose this name because it is the acronym of “Siril’s Interactive Companion” and in French, Sirilic has a consonance close to the Cyrillic word. Post by Carles » This tutorial explains step-by-step how to process raw deep-sky images using, at first, the automatic processing capabilities of Siril scripts up to the stacking of the images, then the image improvement features of Siril to produce a final image for Web publication for example. What are the major changes in this version since last stable version, 1. Seelive. And for Siril just guessed. The They are both fantastic. . PixInsight is where Test: compared stacking DSS, SIRIL and PI - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: 130SLT, 294MC PRO, 385MC I made a small comparisation of those three most beloved programmes concerning stacking. It is free, runs on several OS platforms and I am trying to figure out if Siril is an alternative for DSS under Page 2 of 2 - Stacking: APP vs Siril vs PI vs DSS vs ASTAP - posted in Experienced Deep Sky Imaging: My $. I totally get your remark about the instructions! If it is substantially better than DSS however, I would appreciate hearing in what ways it is better. DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. The answer may have been different 3 years ago, but the price of the other two has shot up and Siril has gotten a lot better. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 213 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. Tell me: what are the processes or practices that make pi better than siril? I know the basics, but want to learn the details of Siril is so incomprehensible and counterintuitive to me that I stopped trying. I chose this name because it is the acronym of “Siril’s Interactive Companion” and in French, Sirilic has a consonance close to the Cyrillic word. Started with DSS, but downloaded Siril earlier this week. Woohoo! So I decided to image M31 to participate in this months challenge. Finally the 4th was a combination of Gimp and Siril SeeStar S50 Google Image Enhance Gimp Gimp + Siril. After using GraXpert on both, the DSS stack has a better balance. The workfow is very differnt (DSS is for me simple too use), Siril stacks the same Picture in ~50% less time then DSS. Top. HDD's are cheap, so I don't see that as an issue. 11. Stacking Vs Live Stacking - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi All, I hope someone can help me understand something about my stacking results. Siril had largely removed the Page 1 of 3 - Siril a better DSS alternative? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Siril a better DSS alternative? The last couple of days I played with Siril for Windows. Any tips or alternatives? Related Topics Astrophotography Photography Art Hobbies comment sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment erikwarm • Additional comment actions Siril has served me great Reply More posts you may like. I only drizzle when an image is undersampled. In my experience, Sequator is usually the one that stacks the most frames but sometimes outputs slightly lower quality. Page 1 of 2 - Mosaics with SiriL? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: After almost three months straight of cloudy skies, I had clear skies and almost-new moon last night. Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Can anyone explain why stacking in Pixinsight takes so long relative to other products? When comparing PI WBPP to Siril, about 400 frames, PI takes about 4 hours on my system. For a quick and easy method, Google Image Enhanced did a great job. Also, I only use 2x drizzle in DSS. Post by Carles » Mon Mar 22, 2021 7:08 pm. Magic! [Note: the computer must have access to theinternet to access the star catalogue. Has comet stacking feature but at the moment will not do both comet and star stack (like DSS - which occasionally doesn't succeed). Therefore, stacking in PI takes a LOT longer vs Siril. I had a go with Siril for stacking today and It did a good job of removing gradients on an image. I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. It offers advanced image calibration tools, such as dark frame subtraction, flat I've used Siril, PI, APP, DSS and Sequator and I can say for sure in my case, Siril is by far the fastest of all if them (APP easily the slowest). But what about filters, my flats are taken with different exposures depending on filter choice. 5 released on November 22, 2024. 3. Why, they work and fit my modest budget. Sequator amd Siril are my favorites. SiriL is a freeware, cross-platform, astrophotography package that will let you calibrate, stack, and develop DSS vs PixInsight for stacking - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: I did stacking in DSS , however yesterday I downloaded PixInsight and I am wondering if I should redo stacking in the new software. I have started using Siril and it seems a very promising I've personally had worst results when stacking Siril compared to DSS, plus I just find DSS much easier to use. 0 to stack and it's way better! It's a lot faster and can manage stack without calibration frame way better than Dss! Pixinsight for processing, and finishing touch in DSS mostly introduces more inexplicable problems than doing its work in my experience. Siril 1. 1, the current stable version in February 2021 (download ). Also like mentioned is good in mosaics. SiriL because of Hello all. I can bring the stacked image into siril for the initial post processing. Everything about Pixinsight is deliberate Page 1 of 2 - Pixinsight vs DSS - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Pixinsight pros: -Stack, process, and post process all in one(?) -Very powerful and professional -Many tools, including star reduction(?) -Very versatile DSS pros: -Free Please let me know what Ive missed. I use Google quite often since its editor has some excellent features. Siril, on the other hand really has become a kind of PI "Lite" in a remarkably short space of time. 8. Pretty soon it became clear, that getting quality data with this I wouldn't say DSS better at all. I use Siril or APP for gradient removal and background extraction and AstroDenoisePY for noise reduction. But between the three, APP gives me the best results. Siril has DSS beat for stacking, so I'd recommend you check it out. There are settings in ASTAP in this regard, but from the limited playing I've done with them, DSS still wins. 5 November 22, 2024 Interesting topic. e. I run on striped SSD array and Siril + Sirilic just flies, even with my lengthy multisession integrations. The registration algorithm between the two isn't even close. DSS tends to do a better job at eliminating satellite trails than ASTAP. I think DSS tends to be a bit fiddly and not work that well from time to time. I use JR Macros in Affinity for any sharpening I may do later, usually just structure enhance. There is only a small amount of data (about 30 mins) on M81 at the heart with M82 and NGC 3077 off to upper sides. Step 0. Page 1 of 2 - Awkward Stacking Result - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: As my battle with Siril continues, I see really weird things happened, cannot explain why. 5% base and I've tried all 3 and found DSS to work the best. In my standard workflow I use Siril to do debayering, registration and stacking. I feel like Siril got the best of me. Home / Forum / Astrophotography Technical Forums / [Deep Sky] Processing techniques/ Siril vs Deep Sky Stacking [Deep Sky] Processing techniques · Dennis Spender · · 12 · 673 · 0 I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. Good luck. My particular interest is in Siril's capacity to apply background extraction from individual subs before stacking, as I image in a very That's I'd call redundant work, to stack in DSS and then use Siril. Start to finish Rosette DSS output file format (fits vs tiff) - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im using DSS to stack and was just curious if there is a benefit to using one file output format over the other. I have done it before but its been years. 2 Beta, APP, and PI. Siril. 3 mouse clicks. I would say that DSS is a bit easier to use, especially for total beginners. then PI/Siril/DSS/? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im learning PI (Thanks Lazy Geek!!) and PI doesnt seem to use my GPU for stacking. Siril's scripts expect to see the folders labeled lights, darks, biases, and flats. Myself, as I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. 5 defines a star twice as large along x-axis than along y-axis. Siril brought out last September for Windows. Still haven't found anything better than it for mosaics. When it comes strictly to stacking, DSS and Siril are hands down the best programs for stacking, with Siril really being the best of the bunch for cost, platform availability, data processing versatility, and shear speed. Two popular choices in the astrophotography community are Siril It's 10 times slower than Siril and it produces similar or worse quality stacks. Background: I’m an experienced EAA’er but novice astrophotographer The few images I’ve processed have been made using DSS and PhotoShop I need/want PhotoShop, Hi Dennis, just to make sure, I suppose you mean Siril and Deep Sky Stacker. The Effect of superstacking 3 and 5 frames. Siril has added a great deal of features and functionality since I began using it, and I highly Page 1 of 4 - Startools or Pixinsight - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Ive been using free software - DSS, Siril, Gimp. better known as DSS, is arguably one of the most widely used software to calibrate and stack astrophotography images. By kinglevel September 10, 2020 in Imaging - Image Processing, Help and Techniques. Where the same stack takes around 30 minutes (or less?) in Siril. Stacking included building masters for flats, darks and bias. Just a very brief overview of a comparison I did for no other reason than I had a few minutes to kill. Software utilizzato: Siril. The money that I am saving on software will easily pay for a long weekend at an airbnb under dark skies. The images are messy but these are purely stacks including usual cal I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. He agreed with dm60062003 that ASTAP gave a better looking stack, at least for his test photos, but he downgraded ASTAP a little vs. My particular interest is in Siril's capacity to apply background extraction from individual subs before stacking, as I image in a very DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Siril has been great for the initial stretch, background extraction, and color calibration, but it's extremely particular in a lot of ways that make the pre-processing a headache. The im Unbelievably slow compared to DSS it does seem to produce slightly less noisy stacks for me. And DSS has sometimes given me weird stacking artefacts on Evo50 widefield images. The comparison only becomes explicit when you process the data. OSCs and really only began using calibration frames last year. Short 1 Minute Tutorials (DSS, Siril, Sequator) - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: Hey everyone, I remember when I started out the exciting journey of astrophotography, the learning curve was quite steep and it can be quite challenging to begin. ] First application – Siril calculates the precise telescope focal length – 1807. That should be plenty. if i use the astro pixel, this software stack correctly, the problem, astro pixel is a test version and the final version is very expensive Please could somebody tell me if His tl;dr is: PI > SiriL and ASTAP > DSS > AP and APP > Sequator > RegiStar. 8 It doesn't do multi session stacking properly, unlike DSS and it is mind numbingly slow (over an hour to process an image that DSS can handle in 5 minutes) but the results otherwise are OK. I would still argue proper calibration frames will improve an image- did you try siril stacking with calibration files? I think there is a lot of testing you can do to try and squeeze out the best image possible. Background noise, Pixinsigth vs Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have seen many references saying that Pixinsigth is a fantastic software for Astrophotography and a need for some. My particular interest is in Siril's capacity to apply background extraction from individual subs before stacking, as I image in a very Page 2 of 3 - Best way to combine H Alpha, and Oxygen etc in Siril or DSS? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: I assume you meant OIII and Hα? You can follow the color palettes I mentioned in post 19, thats the standard way. Siril will automatically detect anything that looks like a star. If you think that the SIRIL result is good compared to DSS, then I really don’t know what to say. DSS: ~ 5 min. DSS, but its not easy. This animation below is the same as shown above, but with superstacking by 3 the original data. For now, I'm still stacking my FITS in DeepSkyStacker (DSS) because it feels easier and that's what I'm used to, but I'll certainly try Siril's stacking as soon as I collect new FITS (i. Aug 1. The interface is a little difficult at first but easy when you get to know where things are, and there are tutorials on the Siril website. 6 # Anyone using ASIAir and Siril - Question on file format (fit vs raw) - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Dear CloudyNighters, While I am slowly making progress with understanding my gear (largely because of the help from this awesome forum) there is still plenty of way to go on the learning curve. ISO 1600, 280S, 49 frames. APP was not very fast (compared to Siril) but improved in latest beta. But what I needed was a short, Dwarf II Tips: Get better stacking by converting Tif into Fits using Siril and after stacking in DeepSkyStacker to obtain a color stack with better quality. Source Code. (Some I've played with in Python, and for mosaics, I'll fire up DSS. WO Z61, AstroTech field flattener, unmodified Canon 700D. Pixinsight, for example, is very slow. DSS is much simpler to use 😂😂😂 Stacking Images Using DeepSkyStacker or SiriL - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi: Yes, I am quite a newbie with this. Post by Carles » DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Script ag The star colours definitely seem better vs DSS in those M13 shots. Page 1 of 2 - Testing stacking quality of SIRIL vs PixInsight vs Astro Pixel Processor - posted in Experienced Deep Sky Imaging: Has anyone done rigorous testing of the stacking quality of the various options such as I use Siril for most stacking. Post-processing: DSS allows for some basic post-processing of the stacked image. Ha = 17 x 360s, Temp -10 deg C, Gain 200, Offset 50. SubaruB4 - Today, 05:18 PM Astronomy Software & Computers $300 DIY Harmonic Mount. Post by Carles » . In Siril, one can open the However, I think that if you look at the images I posted, SIRIL does a bad job of stacking my frames, while DSS and APP do vastly better. Re: DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. As Bob and Frost mentioned, you would need to have dithered subs when using drizzle. It was made with version 0. For small stacks and mosaics APP works well, but it has terrible algorithm for Page 2 of 3 - Siril a better DSS alternative? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: The latest version is 3. Siril (Greyish) - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Anyone have any thoughts on why Im getting such different results when stacking in DSS vs. But WBPP is much better at alignin M42 dslr processed with StarTools vs Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Tis the season for beginners to post their M42 pics In this case, 219x60-sec images. happy-kat Posts: 372 Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:31 am. I have DSS procedures for both OSC and Mono data sets over 1 night or multiple nights if your interested Clear Skies Martin. However, some people told me that 3. Post by Carles » I have PixInisght as well, but I struggle to find any meaningful differences between the stacks from it and Siril - Siril is much faster though, and definitely produces better stacks than DSS. alignment), it supports only basic transformations. My purpose was primarily to find the fastest stacker that did a good job because I shoot a lot of short subs. If there are no further updates, support for later cameras As per my earlier comment, DSS is pretty automated and in my opinion it provides subtle inferior images. Siril just works better and is more optimized. (Yes, I know PI can also stack, though I dont specifically know how to do it yet, and I know DSS fairly well) Thanks! As the region of sky lay between ~44 and 80 degrees elevation, it is reasonable to assume that the background sky glow will only change slowly across the field. 3. Why? Story goes like this: I started my new hobby with 130SLT alt_az and ASI385MC. Posted September 11, 2020. I have had an extensive education for the past month wanting to get back into astronomy and the imaging process. 6 exist, and it seems to support D810A better than 3. Siril, depending on settings, can be even faster. Elaborazione fotografica altazimutale. Pixinsight sounds Hi Troy, thank you for your insights about Siril I'm happy with Siril for stacking, and usually don't run into problems. If you find Siril too bad (and I hate script and CLI based software) then Sirilic gets round some of the problems, although it spends ages copying files Before that I used siril. The green color will still appear, but working with its own stacks the color calibration is mostly on point, regardless of the source file formats as it just converts everything into fits anyways Siril is a free image stacking and processing software with advanced features. I haven't found anything I'm Stacking Rossette In DSS (Yellowish) vs. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 150 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. PixInsight When it comes to astrophotography, having the right software can make a world of difference. Aug 7. Comparing to stack the same set of subs in DSS, PI and Siril, I found Siril to deliver the best results. However, during your progress, sooner or later, you will hit the limits of DSS. ) Then I tend to use Gimp for adjusting some of it, or some of the other fits tools and things like ImageJ. astropixelprocessor. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 193 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. com ), In part because stacking large mosaics was one of its selling points. Processing times: APP: ~13 min. Stretching was done in APP for all three stacks with 15% BG, 3 sigma, 2. Once superstacking is completed, you can open superstack folder in Siril, and proceed with this new sequence exactly as described in the animation section. (Release notes) Linux AppImage Linux Flatpak Linux Windows 64-bit Windows Portable Windows. All three tools used similar stacking parameters. But no problem, NINA can **Stacking in DSS vs Stacking in Siril** Ciao, ho appena messo le mani sulla nuova versione di Siril (1. Post by Carles » Aligning but NOT Stacking 3 Seperate Images in DSS or SIRILhow can this be so hard?!? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi All, Ive been using a single L-eXtreme filter for HA+OIII, but recently got a Askar D2 Filter to capture OIII and SII with my one OSC camera. I am trying to use SIRIL to process my images after stacking in DSS and am trying to figure out the best file format to Pixinsite vs Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I own a copy of Pixinsite. I haven't tried PI or APP, but for my use, Siril and PS suffice. My question concerns DeepSkyStacker and SiriL. Affinity Photo and Siril and they all just produce 'different' stacks, to my eyes, not better or worse. The two images were both stacked using the same lights, darks, flats and dark flats. The only feature I'd like to see in Affinity is more control over image selection. The scripts will fail if the folders aren't labeled as such. Gimp is best, in my opinion, from what I can see on my cell phone. Interestingly, during the alignment process it's flipped the image 180degree horizontally (compared to DSS) and I think colours have come out slightly better. And it's also the only one I Understanding “Dark Flats” - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Trying to get a better grip on calibration files and want to understand “Dark Flats” and how they work. That is to say strecth and export a video. r/telescopes • Moon close up DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. My particular interest is in Siril's capacity to apply background extraction from individual subs before stacking, as I image in a very Stacking: DSS stacks the aligned images on top of each other to create a final image that has less noise and better detail than any of the individual images. Skywatcher 190MN, ASI 2600 or astro modded Canon 700d, guided by OAG, ASI120, PHD2. Frequently, the algorithm will detect Comparison between the single image (top) (Sony RX10 ISO 6400) and the result of stacking 30 images (bottom). The Z7ii has been out for a few years, so it is surely covered by a modern libRAW version. Members; 326 482 Posted September 11, 2020. 8. And after many exchanges on the Webastro forum and many improvements, version 1. SiriL: ~4 min. In DSS, i have tried all available options with the same results. 0 Starnet++ functionality was not integrated. 0 has no additional dependencies beyond requiring that Siril is compiled with libtiff support (this is the For programs like DSS and Siril and even PixInsight, the code to manage that Raw Decoding is libRAW - which a non-profit group works to maintain and releases a few updates to their libRAW. Further processing I do in PI. 0. Come funziona Siril?Stack ed elaborazione in Siril. Astap is also very good but sometimes I get some artifacts on the final image Look at these two images of M13, one stacked with DSS and one stacked with Siril (second one): See how the orange HD star has a halo around it from imprecise stacking on DSS, which doesn’t appear with Siril. A this very moment I'm looking at the difference between the WBPP stack and DSS stack of the Cave Nebula subs I took last night. I want to be able to take many images from my dslr, but instead of Not much difference between stacking in DSS/APP but APP handles better background gradients. Post by Carles » My answer after downloading PixInsight, AstroPixelProcessor and Siril is that I am going with the free software. The "s" on the end is important for the scripts to work. FWIW, I used to have issues with calibration frames until I switched to Siril and stated doing the masters individually. 18. 2. Recent issue that got me scratching my head is this: ASIAir DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. PixInsight is where everyone eventually ends up. 1 Seelive. So Id upload your Hα file to the red, and Oiii to green and DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. But of course, as Siril is a free software, you can build from the sources, available through the installation page. Hello all, I'm trying out these three softwares for stacking my files to see if I get better results with one or the other. That said, I have used Siril since I began our hobby. Post by Carles » Siril is much more hands on than DSS and doesn't automate the process, so I need to know exactly what to do. M81 & M82, taken on May, 2015. I have used Live Stack in SharpCap and got very pleasing DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Also, note that in my original post I suggested that that the problem was my mistake and/or ignorance. 4. 30 x flats 30 x dark flats. Check out the downloads page. DSS is fast. DSS vs Sequator Question Okay so, I can guess this has probably been asked before here lol buut why does deep sky stacker seem to take so much longer to process my images than sequator? is it really worth that extra time?? just seems a little odd to me that sequator is so much quicker? surely there's a trade off in this? https://www Having been a user of DSS for several years, I've recently had a look at the stacking feature in ASTAP. Top Posters In This Topic. clear sky at night). 3 mm rather than 1800 mm DSS & Startrails - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im struggling getting DSS to do star trails. Yellow cast is totally normal as I use an OSC with L-pro filter and tends to give that cast untill I use whipe or in siril Background extraction. APP - 3 times slower, a bit better noise and color/colour. It's still great software. What DSS did on a layer, Sirilic DSS works directly with pretty much any image format on the planet. So. Share No idea but worth giving Siril a go see how that compares . Sequator is pretty good to start off with but wasn't aligning perfectly on my images, hence the switch to DSS. And right now I still don't get better result with pi to when processing the same data with siril. Questions and answers about processing in StarTools and how to accomplish certain tasks. I took around 125 subs of M3, stacked a DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. But as I said, its up to you. And it's reasonably fast. For example, in the process of image registration (i. No calibration. Whatever parameters I would try in PI, Siril gave superior stacks in terms of details vs noise. Aug 2. For comparison here's the same data stacked in DSS, 2 DSS VS Astro pixel - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: Good night I open this thread because i am trying to stack with DSS the pictures taken of M31 but it is impossible, nothing appear. I hope to be able compare both programms again The thing I like about Affinity is the nice balance it strikes between power and ease-of-use. This was around the time after D810A was announced. 30 x matching darks. Popular Days. However in the end, "the song remains the same". For DSS and ASTAP I follow the recomended settings as per the Manual / website. Sometimes it rejects too many frames while the other two are able to handle it. Also if I save I have compared DSS and ASTAP stacks in startools, and the ASTAP stack provides results that are much better than DSS. DSS has a lot more options in terms of the stacking method than ASTAP. I tested this all out over the last few nights and got some great stacks from both filters, plus a DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. It might also effect what you get with PI compared with DSS if there is a difference. I understand that they should be taken with cap on at the same temp, gain and exposure as normal flats. New Siril Integration #. Only problem is that my Altair 533 on my AT80EDT doesnt have the FOV to image it. 0rc1 is distributed for the 3 most common platforms (Windows, macOS, GNU / Linux). It DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. I tried several programs to remove the sky glow. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 152 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. ASI Studio (Red) Vs. Also, Siril is the weapon of I agree in that DSS is easier to use but Siril is much more powerful for pre processing. For those who are experienced in image processing here, do you use PI for stacking, or stack elsewhere and then go to PI, or something similar? Page 1 of 2 - SiriL, PI, APT, APP, and Startools, oh my! - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: There are too many choices and not enough obvious reasons to know which is best for me. Thanks in advance for any help! 1 Replies 32; Created 4 yr; Last Reply 4 yr; Top Posters In This Topic. Then I moved to Pixinsight, and got on with it a lot better than I expected. I cannot acces the Pixinsigth page as there is a notice saying that the page is not safe as it uses a non-compatible protocol. aligns and stacks all the images. DSS incorporates whatever is the "current" full DSS Results vs Sequator. Siril wins being the fastest, higher contrast, tighter stars. then Page 2 of 2 - A simple APP vs Pixinsight comparison for beginners - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Great discussion, I’ve recently been using all four of the major stackers available to me to compare: DSS, SIRIL 1. Aug 3. Now Id like to join the big leagues, so should I got for Startools or Pixinsight? Thanks. Siril then compares the star colours in thecaptured image with those in the star catalogue and adjust the colour balanceto correct that in the image. Post by Carles » Trouble with stacking- PI, SIRIL, DSS - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Recently I have had some serious trouble with stacking and I cant understand why A year ago, when I started with this hobby, I had no issues Do you know what DSS does in the background? Might be worth finding out to see if there is similarity or differences in how it might be done with PI. I've stacked many images using Affinity, SiriL, PixInSight and APP, and really found very little difference between them. I used to use DSS, but got much better stacking results with Siril. For pure speed and quality of stacks, Siril cannot be beat though. I use deepskystacker to stack then move it to SiriL do a autostretch then a color calibration and background extraction which removes gradients/light pollution and move it to gimp stretch it do a S curve and some other adjustments and im done :) tekn0lust • They are both fantastic. Im considering upgrading to a more powerful stacking and editing software. Siril is a free, open-source software designed specifically for astrophotography enthusiasts. Here is a comparison of the same DSS-stacked TIFF, developed in Affinity Photo (using curve adjustments) and in Siril + Affinity Photo : Stacking in DSS and Processing in SIRIL - best file format to use? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I am just getting started in processing and I think I have figured out Deep Sky Stacker well enough that I am happy with the stacking results. 0 of Sirilic was released in June 2019. The roundness of a star is defined as the ratio between its FWHM along y-axis and x-axis. Sequator had done a good job of removing hot pixels but, though DSS had had hot pixel rejection removal included, they were very prominent – though easy to remove using the ‘Select Colour Range’ tool. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 161 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. What DSS did on a layer, Sirilic Remove ads . I find the sheer vastness of it's available processes gives so much fine control over every facet of the image and l really like that, but it is a slow procedure to complete an image - I can spend Page 1 of 2 - Stacking performance: PI vs. Step 1. 99. dll every year. I'm about ready to go back to DSS for stacking for everything. The problem is, DSS is sooo easy to use, and, because I'm so lazy, it's a struggle to motivate myself to learn how to use Siril for DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 190 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. Siril + Sirilic, Startools, Photoshop, Topaz (DeNoise, Gigapixel & Sharpen) Reply reply bizbizq • I switched from Dss to siril 2. Ill be processing in PixInsight afterwards. 20 beta 2) che fra le altre cose integra la possibilità di usare Starnet++ come plugin per DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. My system is no slouch. DSS came out as no 3. Hi Troy, thank you for your insights about Siril I'm happy with Siril for stacking, and usually don't run into problems. It seems that the stack produced by Siril shows a bit more detail than the DSS result. Siril does stacking even faster than DSS. I also tried Siril, I like Siril for its flexibility and a lot of options for manual control while stacking. I use siril, dss and sequator. Is there anything useful in Siril that is not in Pixinsite s-dss-vs-astap/ Also, another useful feature that siril has, over PI, are developers that are very proactive and helpful in addressing bug reports - Cyril, Cecil, and Adrian are doing an amazing Sequator vs DSS for Stacking - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hello fellow space junkies, I havent been able to find an equivalent in DSS to Sequators Accumulation stacking method. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 197 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. macOS Intel macOS Apple Silicon macOS. As a matter of fact in Siril manual it is also stated that you should expect inferior results if you use scripts exactly for that reason, because it's automated. That's my only real gripe with DSS is that you can't make masters without stacking lights, but for freeware, I'm definitely not complaining. Vecinimod - Today, 05:10 PM ATM, Optics and DIY Forum In this video I will go over my current workflow for Deep Sky Object processing using Siril, Starnet++, DeepSkyStacker and Photoshop. I did use DSS and Siril. 14. Click home icon, open the folder containing the folders above Step 2. Moreover, there are some killer features like background correction before stacking. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 191 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. Edited by vidrazor, 08 May 2024 - 08:17 PM. In fact, DSS is still king - its interface is the easiest and fastest to use, its speed of stacking is good, and it makes almost as good stacks as Siril. Post by Carles » Siril 1. Confronto con Deep Sky Staker. Anybody use ASTAP or Siril for image stacking? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: I have been using APP (Astro Pixel Processor https://www. Mosaic mode on DSS sucks. lbyglq urdpsj teonfv vyp jrjdcx dook bkk lfme cbdvkh rblfb