Status decision in process without review Workday application status “under review” The application status “under review” refers to the first stages of the application process. Elsevier tracker says "Required reviews completed" but Editorial Manager status still says "Under review". Reviewers know the identity of the authors, but authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. Now it has been in 'Decision in Process' for more than 1 month. Decision in Process: The decision process may require some time since the editor needs to read the revised manuscript and the revisions/rebuttal from the author to make a decision. However, a manuscript can also be rejected after peer review. decision without allocating reviewers. I am confused whether it would be too early to contact the editor about the status of the paper. My status is changed This procedure is followed by most journals. If you're asking why "with editor" didn't show up, there's a good chance it did, but the editor made a decision in a few minutes and you didn't notice it. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it’s a Nature journal, that’s unlikely. Please what means ''with editor''. 70% of unsolicited manuscripts are rejected without review beyond that of the editor. They will determine if we need any more information from you. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. An acceptance at this stage is extremely rare. JCO Journals employ a single-blind review process. If the reviews are weak or conflicting, As about 40 days have passed from the time of the submission to the time of the status change, it probably means that your article has been sent for peer review. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the Peer Review Process. However, if the status changes directly to "Decision in process" after "Editor assigned" or "With Editor," it is an indication that your paper might be rejected without review. " The first decision could either be a rejection without peer review or a request to revise and resubmit after peer review. The status became “Under Editor Evaluation” on Jan. Initial submission. Decision in process: The peer-review of your article has been completed, and the decision letter will be emailed to you shortly. However, till date, I have not received a decision. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. The status 'Decision started' indicates that the peer review process for your manuscript is complete and the paper is now with the editor. Usually not a good sign; a desk rejection is very likely. There is no comment by Reviewer, and Associate Editor (AE) is suggesting the revision and the resubmission as de novo, which looks major revision actually. An example of how the status date might change but the status remains as "decision in progress" is if the journal is set up so that the editorial board member makes a decision, the decision is forwarded to the editor-in-chief, and the editor-in In this light, a journal’s “Decision in Process” status indicates that the editorial board is still currently considering your submission before they make a final decision. I thought some revision would be required, but the status was directly changed to “Decision in Process”. Decisions on appeals are final without exception. Manuscript Sent for Additional Reviews: Another possible scenario is that the editor has decided to I submitted the second revision of a study to an Elsevier journal on November 11. In this overview article, we contend a theoretical review regarding most theorizing John S. The “decision in process” only lasts a few days to a week. The dashboard status is showing that the paper is under review but the editor has given the decision on dated 25. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the The legacy VA appeals process has changed to the decision review process. 5), and received the decision only after 3 days after submission. The change from ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ to ‘Awaiting Admin Final Processing’ without informing you is odd. After different status changes, the tracking system has been showing "Reviews completed" since 21/09/2017. 18, 2017, and then “Decision in Process” on Jan. Decision-making is a crucial skill that has a central role in everyday life and is necessary for adaptation to the environment and autonomy. You’ll be able to check the evidence you’ve filed online and any additional evidence we’ve requested from you. A manuscript can receive any of the following decisions: Accept Reject; Resubmit with major revisions; Resubmit with minor revisions Thus, it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. ’ So, there may be some reason to hope. Please let me know the meaning of 'Decision in process. How Long Does Decision in Process Take? The whole process of manuscript reviewing takes around 4-8 weeks, in my experience. It has been 3 weeks that the paper status stuck at decision in process. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? The turnaround time (TAT) for this journal is 2. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. To be absolutely certain of this though, you could wait for the next status update (which could be a while) or you could mail the editor. Ideally, they should contact you for the decision and then move the manuscript to the final admin processing. Thanks to Elsevier tracker I saw that 3 reviewers accepted an invitation and subsequently all 3 submitted their reviews (this journal usually requires 2 or 3 reviews). This could be for all sorts of reasons, e. The handling editor then looks into it and make the next step: revise/final decision/reject. Your Supplemental Claim was closed We closed your Supplemental Claim. Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? Can the status change to "Decision in I would like to ask whether you had a similar experience. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision Dear all, yesterday, I submitted my revised paper that had received a "major revision. My manuscript was submitted on the 15th of June and the status was "out for review". 3 weeks and it is over two weeks now. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. ' The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. If the paper The status "required reviews completed back to editor assigned" in a manuscript submission system typically means that the peer review process for the manuscript has been completed, and the In the context of the journal review process, the status "Decision Rescinded" typically indicates that a previous decision made on a manuscript has been reversed or withdrawn by the editor or journal. For insights into peer review and journal decision-making that may help address any remaining worries, you may wish to go through the following articles: Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; How a journal editor reaches a decision on a manuscript after peer review; Hope that helps. Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all the peer reviews have been completed and received by the editorial office. 18th of July, the status is showing “Editor assigned. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. If the status changes to "Under review," you can rest assured that your paper has cleared the initial editorial screening. Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. ' However, I'm I had submitted a paper to a Springer journal on 29th may 2019. It is the ability to choose between two or more options, and it has been studied through several theoretical approaches and by different disciplines. Does it mean that the manuscript will be sent again for another The status consequently changed and was "Decision in process" for 3 days, when right after it changed to "With editor". As it’s happening before peer review, it It is possible that a submitted research paper already shows such serious formal deficiencies in a cusory evaluation that the scientific paper is rejected without further review process. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has During the peer review process your article will show a status of ‘Under Review’. 21, 2016. If Authors are able to monitor the status of their paper throughout the peer review process. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. paper The status date changes whenever someone does something to the paper. Arenas. opinion/perspective pieces, and other longer article types should ideally be sent for peer review and the editorial decision should be based on the reviewers' recommendation. Again, on September 28, the status was ‘Under review’. Some examples include “editor assigned” “reviewers What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Who takes the final decision on a manuscript: the AE or EiC? Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? of your manuscript’s ‘Decision pending’: The ball is in the EIC’s court now. It may also mean that they would want you to submit the manuscript to a sister journal (one in the same publisher family). ” Once the additional review is completed, the status will return to “Required Reviews Complete. The time taken for pending decisions varies by journal and editor. Manuscripts sent for external review are typically evaluated by at least two reviewers. Decision in Process: This means that the editor If the status date changes, but the status remains the same, it indicates that the editor has accessed the database to check your manuscript. A change to the EIC decision status without going for peer review does not always mean a reject. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is A status change from AE Assigned to AE Review means that the manuscript has been picked up by the AE for review. How long this stage normally takes ? Thank you very much for the answer. You will also find this ebook useful: Hi Boeing I got into an interview slot for the Indirect Supply Chain Early Career Development Program (Virtual), and was just wondering if this was a good job opportunity for getting started at Boeing. After subsequent changes in the status, finally it showed “Reviews completed” on 5th of July. At this stage when the The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish your paper or not based on their own review or a peer review. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all After only 2 days it was sent out for a review. Editor Decision. what does it mean? The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. 06. Generally, once the status changed from "Under review" to "Decision in process," it means that the review is done and the editor can now make a decision on the paper. Your paper seems to be progressing through the The question presupposes that the behavior of such an editorial system has a meaning. Papers should be submitted via the Journal's online submission system. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. The status change indicates that the editorial team is actively awaiting the pending reviews before progressing further in the decision-making process. At this stage, the editor would access your manuscript to check the reviewer comments or have another final look at the paper itself before making a decision. If you never resubmit your manuscript to that journal, then 2. However, the fact that your manuscript is undergoing further review does not necessarily mean it will take longer than expected. " I checked the status recently and it has changed to "awaiting final decision. ” If it is sent for peer review, the status changes to "Reviewers assigned" or "Under review. At this stage, when the journal decision is in process, the editor will review the revised manuscript and your responses to the reviewers’ comments before making a Decision making is an essential skill that is crucial for success at every level of an organization. The editor is probably going through the reviews to arrive at a decision. Contact. Granting that presupposition, my first guess is that the editor got the reviewers' reports and was about to make a decision ("decision in process") but then noticed that something was unclear in one of the reports and asked the reviewer for a clearer report ("under review"). of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Often journals ask me to review with 2 months deadline. The AE will now go through the manuscript to check for things such as a match with the scope of the journal, the quality of the writing, and even the novelty of the study. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. Does this mean a rejection: Not always. Or the editor decided to terminate the review process on the strength of that one review. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Pathogens Editorial Board, but occasionally a Guest Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Does this mean my paper is likely to be rejected? I’m so anxious about this situation. Before submitting a manuscript It is difficult to tell why exactly the status of your manuscript changed as you haven’t mentioned any previous status changes. So in your case maybe all reviewers are free, no big deal. 2024 as mentioned below The journal’s editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. ” Should I inquire about the review status? Answer: When the status shows "Required reviews completed," it means that the reviews have come in. But sometimes I just review straight 1 or 2 days after agreeing. On December 1, it turned to ‘Decision in Process,’ but has been stuck at this stage for nearly six/seven weeks. Later, on October 19, it was ‘Under editor evaluation’ and on October 22, ‘Decision in process’. Follow this Question. If that is the case, the status "Decision in progress" might be indicative of a rejection. 8 revision rounds during the entire peer-review process. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. “Decision in Process” is also a way for the handling editor to What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses At any good journal, the majority of manuscripts will be rejected in the first decision letter from the Editor, most without external peer review [2, 6, 18]. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism. This may be It is common for the peer review status of a manuscript to change several times before a final decision is reached by the editor. The status changing to "Under review" once again after "Required reviews completed" indicates that the editor has sent your paper for an additional review. With very rare exceptions, the rest will receive a decision letter somewhere in that gray zone calling for revision and resubmission [7, 10, 11, 14,15,16,17]. This form of rejection (rejection without peer review) is known as desk-rejection. I usually wait until 1 week before deadline to review. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection So, do not be surprised if this happens: once the additional review is completed, the status will come back to “Required Reviews Complete. When the status changed to “Decision in Process”, it meant that based on the peer review, the handling editor had made a decision on the manuscript. Hammond was a consultant on decision-making, a former professor of Harvard Business School in Boston, and a coauthor of Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions (Harvard Many journals do not have a peer review process for certain article types, for instance, short communications or letters to the editor. What could it mean? What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and The reason is that the editor receive the opposite review comments in the first review process and the editor can not give the final accurate desicion, so a new comments shoule be obtain before For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Section Editor or one of the Editors-in-Chief. g. Two weeks have been To ensure an efficient and effective peer-review process, the same reviewers will be invited to review the resubmitted manuscript. The status changed to 'Under review' for 3 weeks and then turned to 'Under Editor Evaluation' around Christmas. suddenly the status changed to "decision pending" and has been for two days. If Initially Mystatus was not attended even though i attended interview 1 week ago. It means the ability to assess situations, weigh pros and cons, and select the most appropriate course of action. In your case, since the status has not changed to "Under review" after being "With editor," it means that the paper has not been sent for review. On May 28, it was ‘Under review’. If you do not hear back in 2 weeks, I recommend that we write to the journal for a status check. Then I revised and sent it back. A month is not a considerable time for review and final decision for reputable journals. The status (as usual) changed directly to "With editor" on the system and after 3 The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. Later, on August 29, it was ‘Under editor evaluation’. Decision categories Decision in Process, May 14: This means that the associate editor (AE) made a decision on the paper – based on peer reviews (in case the paper went for review; you haven’t mentioned the status/es before this one) or an A manuscript was submitted to one of the journal in springer on 28/04/2017. Dear Editor, Recently, the status of my revised manuscript in a Springer journal changed as follows: 09 Nov: Submitted to the Journal 11 Nov: under review 03 Dec: under review 05 Dec: Required reviews completed 11 Dec: Decision in process 12 Dec: With Editor. If you have questions at any stage in the I submitted a paper to Elsevier on Oct. Describes the editorial policy and process of peer manuscript review of American Psychologist (AP). And at the second time, the status changed to "decision in process". The status can change to "Under review" again if the editor is not satisfied with the reviews that have come in and sends the paper for an additional review. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. My understanding is that the editor has made the decision based on the reviews, but they have now passed the decision to the editor-in-chief. The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC), whose decision may well be different from the AE/ME’s decision. The final admin processing itself can mean either of two things depending on what the decision is. The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. At the fist time, the handling editor required to revise the manuscript. However, if your paper was "With editor" and then "Decision in process" without "Under review," it might be a situation that, the AE does not think your paper is not enough qualified to be reviewed. On the 27th of June, the status changed to decision pending. Read this article to understand peer review and editorial decision-making process in detail. The status shows "With editor" when a manuscript is going through the initial editorial screening. " In the past, I have submitted many articles to several journals and there has always been the "under review" process. 2 days ago the status changed from Under Review to Decision in Process. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. But I believe it does not hurt to drop them an Email and ask them about the status of your paper. of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. I haven't At this stage, the status of the manuscript is “Editor assigned” or “With Editor. What does it mean? Does it mean my manuscript is rejected? Is it possible that the manuscript is in peer review without assigning the AE? I submitted a paper to IEEE Transactions. It is a process by which experts evaluate scholarly works, and its objective is to ensure a high quality of published science. Status What it means A reviewer is examining your new evidence We received your Supplemental Claim and assigned it to a reviewer. In my case, I got this status two times. On the same day the status changes to "out for review" again. What does it mean? I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal on 13th April. After 1. The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. this is quite a common scenario. Answer: Normally, a direct change from the "With editor" status to a "Decision in process" status does imply a desk rejection. One possible reason for the change could be that “under review” indicates that the reviewer has accepted the invitation to review and “in review” means that the review process has actually started. Related reading: Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. Finally, the status again shows decision pending on the 29th of June. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple It means they're making a decision without peer review. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. This situation happens when there are other similar manuscripts in the review or decision process, and they might need to choose the best of out of them. If there is a decision before it was sent to reviewers, it usually means a desk-rejection. Therefore, it has a high probability of being rejected. If the status of your paper has changed to "decision in process" without first changing to "under review", it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. ). My manuscript status is stucked at " Decision in process" for more than 3 weeks now and the editor and the journal office says the editor has submitted the decision but doesnt say why such a delay. Decision in Process: The Editors have begun a decision in the system. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Section Editor. Granting that presupposition, my first guess is that the editor got the reviewers' reports and was about to make a decision ("decision in process") but then noticed that Its mean editor has drafted a decision about your paper, which is yet to be finalized/posted. You can also check these details: Any evidence you’ve filed Often, the decision taken by a journal on the manuscript in its original form, that is, before it is revised, is referred to as the "first decision. We made a decision We sent you our decision on your Supplemental Claim. Then this decision is emailed to the author by the editor in chief. I wonder whether As it’s a journal by T&F, which is a big publisher, the decision in case of a scope mismatch may be to ask you to submit to some other journal with them. If you have questions at any stage in the The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. Any idea how long it will take to get a final answer on the nomination? I'm also wondering about the rejection rate at this stage for OINP. In a performance review, evaluating an employee’s decision-making abilities is important in determining their overall effectiveness and growth potential. I dropped interview feedback to Infosys yesterday. I'm not sure if the "Under review" status refers to an external or an internal review. In my field (physics), you have a first decision after sixty days for the majority of papers. Based on the Expert Systems with Applications Review Speed Feedback System, it takes 1. As for this journal, the acceptance rate is 10% or less, and the The average number of external revision rounds during the entire peer-reviewed process (include both accepted and rejected manuscript). Is it a bad sign? This is rather unusual. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses Awaiting EIC Decision without assigning reviews. Occasionally, owing to glitches in the system, the submission status tracker might take longer to reflect the current status. The decision letter is proofread, finalized, and forwarded to the contact author. Answer. The previous status is a little confusing though. Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the There will be some time between a manuscript entering the “Decision pending” queue and the contact author receiving the decision letter. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to I have submitted the manuscript to the journal (the approximate IF is 5. One week later, howevee, I found that the status has changed to “Submitted”. Thank you for the information Profs. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. The process is progressing at a reasonable pace considering that the peer review process began on OCT 28. It did not go for peer review. the status moves when 2 reviews have arrived, but only one reviewer submitted a review and the editor's making a decision anyway. 5 months since the first submission, I got a major revision but it made me happy as all the comments were positive mainly on the restructuring of some words, adding references, etc. " Since you have already received an email from the journal informing you about the current status of your manuscript, you have nothing to worry about. For 1 month, the status was "awaiting admin processing. e. Once a Unfortunately, this seems to indicate that your paper will be desk rejected, that is rejected without peer review. In other words when the handling editor of paper takes the decision and submit it in the system then the status gets changed to decision in process. If the status of manuscript changes to “Decision in process” without changing to “Under review,” it is clearly a desk rejection. This stage can last from a couple of minutes The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. The status was ‘Under review’ for a week. Etc. If you aren’t satisfied with the results of the first option you choose, you can try another eligible option. Hi good day, I have submitted my article in energies (energies-3092655) on dated 21. Finally, Coming to your query, Decision in Process typically means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the peer review comments, arrived at a decision on the manuscript based on the comments, and then conveyed When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, It has been 1 month since I submitted an article to one of the leading journals in my field. Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be made by the academic editor after peer review once a For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for In all these situations, the status can remain ‘Required Reviews Completed’, but as you understand now without meaning that the review of your paper has been completed. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Rather than a reject without reviewing (that is, a desk reject), it perhaps means that the editor is busy for various reasons or has certain challenges. In fact, it is so nice to have such a quick review process. Manuscripts should be submitted via the online submission system. Finally today, i. On Jan 5, it turned again to 'Decision in Process' and now it is still stuck at this stage for nearly 2 weeks. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Sustainability and Transformation Editorial Board, but occasionally a Could I have some hope that the status "Decision in process" can have more than one meaning according to the journal. A desk rejection does not involve the often lengthy peer review process and therefore the decision is taken faster. The fact that the status changed from "Required Reviews Completed The legacy VA appeals process has changed to the decision review process. In some journals, “pending approval” indicates that the decision regarding your manuscript is pending approval from the Editor-in-Chief. For three weeks, the status had been "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: *****; Submitted". ” I have a question about the status of my manuscript. " Today the status was changed to "Decision in progress. Now, the status The status "Evaluating recommendation" indicates that the reviews for your paper are complete and the Associate Editor (AE) is evaluating the reviewer suggestions to arrive at a decision about your paper. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Digital Health Editorial Board, but occasionally a Guest Editor is invited At present the review of your paper is done and it is pending decision. You will also find this ebook useful: In this case, the status changing from "out for review" to "with editor" in a day could either mean that the peer review has actually happened that fast or that the manuscript has been returned without a review possibly because the peer reviewer is unable to review the paper for some reason (unavailability, content, etc. Once the editor accesses the database to make the final decision, the status will change to "Decision in process. Check the status of your VA claim, decision review, or appeal online. If you have questions at any stage in the Only a paper that clears this initial screening is sent for peer review; else, it is rejected. Does anyone have any idea I sent an inquiry email and they said the manuscript is undergoing the peer review process normally. 6. " I have submitted my article 3 months ago and I did not receive any revision. The “decision in process” only lasts a few days In some cases, instead of a complete rejection, it may also be a reject-and-resubmit decision, giving you a second chance at submission. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the reviewers were probably already familiar with it, so they could review it within a short time. This senior editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether to reject or send it on to an Associate Editor for further review. The duration of the review process can vary depending The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. My OINP file is in the status "Decision In Progress" since 16 March 2023. However, as they replied that it was ‘under review,’ to summarize, it probably means the journal did the peer review internally. You can find out where your claim, decision review, or appeal is in our review process. 22. 2024. All the best for the next update! If the status of your paper has changed to “decision in process” without first changing to “under review”, it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. I submitted a manuscript to a Wiley journal, and the status became “Under Review” after some days. Subscribe and get curated content The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. Subsequently, the date of the status changed to 13th July while the status remained the same. Thus, I would consider it appropriate to send a polite question to the editor in most cases – if the journal hasn’t given you a status update before this. The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. The corresponding author should indicate whether the work described in the manuscript has been discussed with a This status implies that the referee have submitted his/her report. I have written an email to editor, who replied that the paper is waiting for the editor's decision. Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. Asked on 31 Aug, 2019 . Now, ‘Decision in process’ means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and has communicated this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final decision on the manuscript. On the positive side, it changed to ‘Under Review’ rather than directly to ‘Decision in Process. In such cases, the status might return to “Under Review. " In my experience, it should be "Under review", and then "Decision in progress" a few weeks later, right? We think we have completed 90% of required experiments and responded to every question of reviewers. But if the status changes to “Decision in process” right after the initial screening, then it unfortunately means that the manuscript will be desk-rejected. Would you let me know My submitted manuscript was showing 'With Editor' status for 20 days and it directly changed to 'Decision in Process' without 'Under Review'. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? In any case, it is difficult to determine the exact reason without more information from the journal. and is probably the reason for the status change to “decision in If the status changed to "Under review" directly after submission without any interim changes, it is likely to be the initial editorial screening. In such cases, the status might go back to “Under Review. Editor decided to make a decision before all the reviews have arrived. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has Will be a great help. @Ijaz Durrani and @Jorge P. If your status was "Under review" and then you are waiting for the editor's final decision, long waiting could be a good signal. Sometimes, the That was normal, nothing to worry about. It took one year to complete the review process. I did not receive any intimation from the editorial office about my manuscript not meeting the journal's guidelines. This often, but not always, changes the status. Thanks. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. The Editor may invite more reviewers, returning the submission to 'Under Review' status, or may begin to enter a decision and move the status to 'Decision in Process'. Thus, I'd wait for the decision to arrive in a couple of weeks. This is when a hiring department is briefly looking through application materials to assess I have submitted a manuscript to a journal on September after few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the it changed to all required reviews are completed and immediately to decision in process. Of course, one cannot be sure, but the status changes seem to indicate a higher possibility of a desk rejection, that is, a rejection without peer review. Any help is greatly appreciated sometimes it is a quick process between submitted and DIP then it takes like forever to change the stage, or To give a counterpoint to the people reporting from mathematics or theoretical computer science. Finally, note that this is presently only the associate/managing editor’s decision. Instead, it has been sent to the Editor-in-chief for the final decision. Rejection without peer review is known as desk rejection. If you disagree with a VA benefit or claim decision, you can choose from 3 decision review options (Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review, or Board Appeal) to continue your case. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all the comments by the peer-reviewers and examines the manuscript. This is done to avoid any bias on the part of the . A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. ” Decision in Process: This means that the editor is now determining a decision based on the peer reviewer's comments and their own assessment. ” 7. The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish your paper or not based on their own review or a peer review. " However, if the editor feels that a manuscript does not match the scope or standards required by the journal, it is rejected without review and the status changes to "Decision in process" from "With Editor. After couple of hours, status changed and saying interview would lscheduled shortly. The Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. 3. Related reading: Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals 29 June 2024. In many cases there is cause for another round of reviews which would What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? How can I track the status of my submitted article? Video Guide: Co-Author Verification in Editorial Manager - FAQs ; When can I expect a decision from the Editor? Video Guide: Using the “Track your submission” service The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. Approximately 1/3 of submissions are rejected without external review. Even if the decision in process status takes a couple of weeks more, you have nothing to worry about. You should also consider the amount of time the journal editor needs for gathering all comments and final decision. ” If the journal clears the initial screening, it is then sent out for peer review. I am from the mathematics background. Hopefully, you will be informed of the decision soon. Please share your experiences with the community. This is not necessarily a bad outcome! It means you won't waste time on a review To get to your query straight away, the ‘Decision in Process’ means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) is making a decision on the manuscript. kuysl qybb ceiq xblq zvay sdewu atydbd rfmlbpw vhnfpor ujfxl